diff --git a/This-Process-Is-Secure.md b/This-Process-Is-Secure.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b3ca95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/This-Process-Is-Secure.md
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
For years, Apple had an edge in gadget and item monitoring thanks to its huge Find My community. The community uses Bluetooth signals of surrounding Apple devices and [iTagPro USA](https://healthwiz.co.uk/index.php?title=What_s_Attribution_And_Why_Do_You_Need_It) permits owners to seek out and locate their misplaced objects, while preserving anonymity. So, [iTagPro geofencing](https://repos.ubtob.net/stephanygodley/3757219/wiki/What+to+Learn+About+Sleep+Tracking+Devices) when Google launched its revamped Find My Device network in May 2024, we hoped it could carry similar features for Android users, [affordable item tracker](http://shop.ororo.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=4259456) allowing them to trace and locate their gadgets simply. However, Google's Find My Device community isn't as efficient as we anticipated - at the least in its present stage. A latest comparison of AirTag and Google's Find My Device tracking by a Redditor showed Google's community is miles behind Apple's expertise. And while part of this is due to the network being new and needing time to onboard sufficient users, it is also because Google has made it difficult to make use of this community within the identify of privacy. Ironically, the corporate's privateness claims seem like nothing more than a smokescreen.
+
+
On the surface, each Google's and Apple's networks work in the same vogue. When your device or tracker is left someplace, it sends alerts to nearby Android units. Based on the situation of those nearby gadgets, you'll be able to see the situation of your machine or tracker on your smartphone. This process is secure, [iTagPro USA](https://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/view_profile.php?userid=891990) with the placement information encrypted, [iTagPro features](https://championsleage.review/wiki/User:NolaPinschof085) and Google says it additionally can't access the location information. Google additionally has a bunch of privateness-centered practices in place for the Find My Device network. For example, monitoring only works when multiple Android devices are close by, which makes it tough to trace somebody in a non-public location. Similarly, Google will send you an alert if there's an unidentified tracker close to you with you for an extended interval. On condition that there are over a billion Android units, one would anticipate Google's community to work in addition to, if not higher than, Apple's Find My network. Unfortunately, this is not the case, and that's down to one specific motive.
+
+
Why can’t Google operate equally to Apple's Find My Network? One key difference between Google's and [iTagPro geofencing](https://wiki.drawnet.net/index.php?title=Usu%C3%A1rio:JuliusEdmund190) Apple's Find My networks is that Apple's network is decide-out by default, whereas Google's is decide-in. This implies all Apple gadgets are mechanically part of the Find My network when they sign into their gadget, and customers must actively choose to disable the feature if they wish to choose-out. In distinction, Google's Find My Device community requires customers to opt in (type of). While customers are a part of Find My Device monitoring by default for "aggregated location reporting" when multiple units are around, they aren't opted into particular person location reporting till they join. Users must click on on the notification sent by the Find My Device app and comply with the phrases. Then, their system can be utilized for non-aggregated reporting. Google claims this method is designed to guard consumer privacy, allowing individuals to decide on whether to contribute their gadget's location information to the network.
+
+
Why on earth doesn’t Apple make an AirTag within the form of a credit card? And this is the place the problem lies. Without enough folks onboarded onto the Find My Device community, it is kind of ineffective in its present stage (as discovered by the Redditor). It's significantly ironic that Google is hiding behind person privateness, given the corporate's personal questionable practices with person information. The company, which is thought for monitoring users on-line and utilizing that data for targeted advertising, claims it can't mechanically opt-in users for its Find My Device network due to "user privacy" concerns. And it's not solely about monitoring individuals online
\ No newline at end of file